This week, the Maryland Court of Appeals ruled that de facto parenthood requires both parents’ consent. In other words, an adult involved in a child’s upbringing cannot be considered a de facto parent with a claim for visitation or custody unless both legal parents provide consent and fostered a parent-like relationship with that adult and child.
The term “de facto parent” means “parent in fact” and is used to describe a party, other than a child’s legal parent, i.e., biological or adoptive parent, who claims custody or visitation rights based upon the party’s relationship with a non-biological, non-adopted child. Conover v. Conover, 450 Md. 51, 62 (2016). In Conover, the court outlined the criteria to consider one a de facto parent if they can show that:
The legal parent consented to and fostered the relationship between you and the child;
You have lived with the child;
You perform parental functions for the child to a significant degree, and
A parent-child bond has been forged over enough time.
Years later, in E.N. v. T.R., 471 Md. 519 (2020), the Court of Appeals had to decide whether a de facto parent relationship can be created through the fostering and consent of only one legal parent to the formation of such a relationship, without the consent of the second legal parent. The court noted that to declare the existence of de facto parenthood based on consent of only one legal parent and ignore whether second legal parent undermines that parent’s constitutional right to care, custody, and control of parent’s children.
This week’s Court of Appeal’s decision in E.N. v. T.R. raises the burden of meeting the consent element of de facto parenthood. Essentially, to be considered a de facto parent, that individual must have both of the legal parents’ consent and fostering of a parent-like relationship with that adult and child.
If you have any questions about de facto parenthood, please call us at (443) 741-2567 and we would be happy to meet with you to discuss your case.